OM1 shade selector for zirconia discs
Comparison of the original Aidite 3D Pro Zir zirconia disc and the new Aidite 3D Pro Zir Ultra, showing the transition to the upgraded Ultra formulation with the same esthetics and higher strength for dental laboratories.
Comparison of esthetic multilayer zirconia discs including Aidite 3D Pro Zir Ultra, Aidite AiZir, and XTCERA 3D Multilayer for dental laboratories.
Buy 3 eligible dental lab products and save 3%. You can mix and match products. “Buy 2, Save $2 each” pairs count as one item.
Free shipping on eligible dental lab products from Gro3X.

APW9812GCM

OM1 Esthetic Multilayer Zirconia Discs

Sale price$115.95
/
Which zirconia is right for your workflow?
Choose Disc Size (mm)
Smart Quantity Pricing
  • In stock, ready to ship
  • Backordered, shipping soon
Gro3X Zirconia for Dental Labs

Choose the right esthetic multilayer zirconia with confidence.

Compare incisal translucency, cervical strength, shade flexibility, and production value across three esthetic multilayer zirconia options for dental labs.
Looking for the original formula? Shop legacy Aidite 3D Pro Zir while supplies last.

Performance snapshots.

Strength is shown on the left. Translucency is shown on the right. The symmetric symbolic tooth illustrates incisal and cervical zones.

Aidite 3D Pro Zir Ultra

Incisal strength
950 MPa
Cervical strength
1250 MPa
Incisal Cervical
Incisal translucency
57%
Cervical translucency
43%
Best fit: labs that liked the 3D Pro Zir esthetic experience and want more strength margin.
Highest incisal translucency Added strength Premium anterior esthetics

XTCERA 3D Multilayer

Incisal strength
750 MPa
Cervical strength
1250 MPa
Incisal Cervical
Incisal translucency
55%
Cervical translucency
43%
Best fit: pre-shaded natural-gradient value.
Natural color transition Pre-shaded simplicity

The easy way to explain the lineup.

Choose Aidite 3D Pro Zir Ultra when you want the 3D Pro Zir esthetic experience with more strength. Choose Aidite AiZir for everyday crown-and-bridge flexibility. Choose XTCERA 3D Multilayer for natural-gradient value.

Frequently asked questions about esthetic multilayer zirconia.

Clear answers for dental labs comparing esthetic multilayer zirconia discs for CAD/CAM crown-and-bridge production.

Which zirconia disc should I choose for highly esthetic anterior crowns?

For highly esthetic anterior crowns, choose an esthetic multilayer zirconia disc with high incisal translucency, natural shade progression, and sufficient strength for reliable daily anterior use. Among these esthetic options, Aidite 3D Pro Zir Ultra offers the highest incisal translucency at 57%, closely followed by XTCERA 3D Multilayer at 55% and Aidite AiZir at 53%. All three are strong choices when the restoration needs to blend with a lighter natural dentition while still providing the durability expected from modern esthetic multilayer zirconia.

Which esthetic multilayer zirconia is a good everyday choice for crown-and-bridge production?

Aidite AiZir is a strong everyday esthetic multilayer zirconia for crown-and-bridge production because it combines high strength, high translucency, broad indication coverage, and exceptional shade flexibility. For labs that want one material to cover a wide range of daily cases, Aidite AiZir offers a practical balance of esthetics, durability, and workflow efficiency. Its shade system includes 16 VITA Classical shades, three bleach shades, and 11 VITA 3D-Master shades, giving labs more flexibility to match the cases that come through their workflow.

Which multilayer zirconia is best when I need both natural translucency and reliable strength?

For cases that require both natural translucency and reliable strength, look for an esthetic multilayer zirconia with higher translucency in the incisal area for lifelike esthetics and higher strength in the cervical area for durability. Among esthetic multilayer zirconia options, Aidite 3D Pro Zir Ultra is designed for this balance, building on the premium esthetics of Aidite’s legacy 3D Pro Zir while adding 1,250 MPa cervical strength and 950 MPa incisal strength.

How does esthetic multilayer zirconia compare to high-strength zirconia?

Esthetic multilayer zirconia is usually chosen for natural appearance, while high-strength zirconia is usually chosen for maximum durability. Esthetic multilayer zirconia uses layered color and translucency to help crowns and bridges blend better with surrounding teeth. It achieves this effect by transitioning from higher-strength, lower-translucency zirconia in the cervical area to higher-translucency, lower-strength zirconia toward the incisal area.

High-strength zirconia prioritizes structural reliability and is often preferred for long-span bridges, full-arch cases, and high-load posterior restorations. It typically maintains more consistent strength and translucency from cervical to incisal, which supports reliable structural performance but may compromise natural shade gradation and enamel-like translucency.

Esthetic multilayer zirconia is usually the better choice when appearance, translucency, and shade blending are the main priorities. High-strength zirconia is preferred when maximum structural support is required.

What is the difference between esthetic multilayer zirconia and fast-sintering zirconia?

Esthetic multilayer zirconia is chosen primarily for natural appearance, smooth shade transition, and a balanced combination of translucency and strength. Fast-sintering zirconia is chosen primarily for speed, efficiency, and faster turnaround times in high-volume, rush-case, or same-day production workflows.

Some zirconia materials may offer both esthetic and fast-sintering advantages, but the main decision depends on the lab’s priority. Choose esthetic multilayer zirconia when appearance, translucency, and shade blending matter most. Choose fast-sintering zirconia when rapid production, same-day turnaround, or shorter sintering cycles are the main goal.

How does esthetic multilayer zirconia compare to value zirconia for dental labs?

Esthetic multilayer zirconia is often the better choice when a restoration requires a more natural appearance, layered shade transition, and higher perceived esthetic value. Value zirconia is usually chosen when a lab needs a lower-cost material for routine posterior crowns, everyday production, or price-sensitive cases.

Both options can restore the functional requirements of the case when used within their approved indications. The choice is often a business-positioning decision: whether the lab wants to offer a cost-efficient functional solution, a higher-esthetic premium option, or both.

When should a dental lab use esthetic multilayer zirconia?

A dental lab should use esthetic multilayer zirconia when a case requires natural shade blending, smooth gradient transition, and a strong balance of esthetics and durability. It is especially appropriate for anterior crowns, visible premolars, cosmetic cases, and everyday crown-and-bridge restorations where flat monochromatic zirconia may lack the natural depth, translucency, and lifelike appearance of a layered material. For long-span, full-arch, or high-load cases, a higher-strength zirconia may be the better choice.

What types of restorations are best suited for esthetic multilayer zirconia?

Esthetic multilayer zirconia is well suited for restorations where natural appearance and shade blending matter, including anterior crowns, visible premolars, implant crowns, posterior crowns, veneer-style restorations, and short-span bridges. It is especially useful when a case requires more natural depth, translucency, and gradient transition than traditional high-strength monochromatic zirconia.

For long-span bridges, full-arch restorations, or high-load cases, labs should confirm that the selected esthetic multilayer zirconia meets the manufacturer’s strength and indication guidelines.

When is OM1 the right shade choice for zirconia restorations?

OM1 is a good zirconia shade choice when the patient’s target shade is very bright, high-value, and distinctly whiter than the natural shades in the VITA Classical range. It is commonly selected for bleach-shade cases, cosmetic restorations, smile makeovers, and patients with professionally whitened dentitions where a clean, luminous appearance is desired. Compared with OM2 and OM3, OM1 is generally the brightest and highest-value option within the OM bleach-shade group.

For patients seeking a slightly softer or less intense bleach result, OM2 or OM3 may provide a closer match. For more natural-looking dentitions, shades such as A1, B1, or other VITA Classical shades may be more appropriate. Final shade selection should be verified against the dentist’s prescription, clinical shade records, adjacent teeth, stump shade, restoration thickness, and the selected zirconia system.

How does esthetic multilayer zirconia help reduce staining and finishing time?

Esthetic multilayer zirconia can help reduce staining and finishing time because the disc already contains a built-in shade and translucency gradient. Instead of creating all color depth manually with liquids, stains, or porcelain layering, the lab starts with a more natural-looking material foundation.

This can simplify finishing, improve consistency, and help technicians produce natural-looking restorations with less manual characterization, depending on the case requirements and final esthetic expectations.

Can esthetic multilayer zirconia be used in standard CAD/CAM milling workflows?

Yes. Esthetic multilayer zirconia can be used in standard dental CAD/CAM workflows with compatible milling machines, CAD- and nesting-software, sintering furnaces, and finishing protocols. Labs should follow the manufacturer’s recommended milling, nesting, drying, and sintering instructions to achieve the intended strength, fit, shade accuracy, and translucency.

For multilayer zirconia, proper nesting is especially important because the restoration’s position within the disc affects the final cervical-to-incisal shade transition.

What sintering considerations should labs know before using esthetic multilayer zirconia?

Labs should know that zirconia sintering and porcelain firing require different furnace types. Zirconia sintering is typically a multi-hour process and, depending on the material, furnace, restoration size, and program, may extend into the next production day.

Labs should always follow the manufacturer’s recommended instructions for the specific zirconia brand, disc thickness, restoration type, and indication. Proper sintering is essential for achieving the intended final strength, fit, shade accuracy, and translucency. Incorrect sintering times, temperatures, heating rates, or cooling protocols can affect both the mechanical performance and esthetic outcome of the restoration.

For esthetic multilayer zirconia, nesting position is especially important. The restoration’s placement within the disc determines how the incisal, body, and cervical layers appear in the final restoration. Proper nesting helps ensure that the translucent incisal zone, body shade transition, and cervical support area are positioned correctly for a natural-looking and reliable result.

Note: Always follow the manufacturer’s official instructions for indications, minimum wall thickness, connector dimensions, nesting, milling, sintering, finishing, and clinical use.

 

Why dental labs trust Gro3X

Customer reviews consistently highlight Gro3X for fast shipping, dependable service, accurate order fulfillment, quality products, and responsive support.

Social Icons · Gro3X